How will Covid-19/Coronavirus Affect my Alternative Investment Portfolio? Part 44: December 26th

Updated: 3 days ago

Third U.S. death wave slows, but continues to rise; Crystal ball: Third infection wave continues to flatten, but may not last as Americans ignore health advice and set pandemic record for holiday travel; World round up: Crisis intensifies in South Korea, Belgium and the United Kingdom. State Roundup: "We are running out of options. If people don't stay home for Christmas it will break our hospital"; Georgia’s bellwether economic recovery: Revisited next week; Unemployment: "The beatings will continue until morale improves"; Financial cliff: After conclusion of epic struggle to compromise, rug pulled out from under both parties at 11th hour by White House; CBRE report predicts commercial real estate’s pandemic pain is only just beginning; Experts suspect new highly contagious UK variant mutation may already be in the U.S. Update on my portfolio strategy.



Covid-19 patients overflow former lobby of St. Mary's Hospital in California as hospitals in the state hit 0% ICU capacity this week.

(Usual disclaimer: I'm just an investor expressing my personal opinion and am not an attorney, accountant nor your financial advisor. Consult your own financial professionals before making any financial decisions. Code of Ethics: To remove conflicts of interest that are rife on other sites, I/we do not accept any money from any sponsors or platforms for publicity nor for the referral of any investors. This includes but is not limited to: no money for postings, nor reviews, nor advertising, nor affiliate leads etc. Nor do I/we negotiate special terms for ourselves in the club above what we negotiate for the benefit of members. Info may contains errors so use at your own risk.)


Quick Summary


This week there was the usual flood of new information on virus spread, economic impact, investment repercussions, as well as about the virus itself.

This article is part of a multi-article series that's been published weekly since the pandemic began, back in March 2020. It started with three introductory articles on the virus and its effect on the economy and on alternative investment classes. Then it moved on to weekly updates on the latest and greatest developments (along with weekly updates on my evolving personal portfolio strategy). You can see the links to every article in the series here.

Third U.S. death wave slows, but keeps rising.


For the 33rd week in a row, the United States battled the coronavirus called SARS-CoV-2, which causes the Covid-19 disease. And as of Saturday morning, the official death toll had climbed to 338,263 (versus 322,186 last Saturday morning). Here's a quick summary of what's happened so far:

  • 1. The first U.S. death wave started in early March. It was overwhelmingly in urban areas (like New York City in the Northeast). It peaked on April 21st and the country fought it down until July 6th.

  • 2. The second death wave started on July 7th. This ran predominantly through urban areas in the Sun Belt. It peaked on August 1st, before falling until October 8th.

  • 3. Then the third death wave began on October 9th and is currently tracking upwards. Unlike earlier waves, this was led by rural areas (although now it is spreading across the entire country and surging in all areas).


How did things go this week?


This week was a little bit odd, because some sources didn't report data due to the Christmas holiday. So that probably artificially depressed some of the numbers at the end of the week. As a result, I'm going to ignore that portion of the week on this graph (and others later in this article).


So, ignoring that: deaths slowed versus last week, but still rose. And yet again, they set new records which shattered early pandemic highs.


Unlike the two previous waves, this third one is widely distributed throughout the country, which many experts say will make it much more difficult to contain and to fight. And as we discussed in late October, this has already caused acute shortages of critical drugs and key medical personnel needed to fight the disease and limit deaths. On the other hand, many states have enacted varying lockdowns which may start to kick in and change the trajectory. So we’ll be watching this very closely to see what happens.


Crystal ball: Third infection wave continues to flatten, but may not last as Americans ignore health advice and set pandemic record for holiday travel

If we're unable to make clear progress and deaths remain high, then the overwhelming consensus of economists is that this would sabotage hopes of a quick, V-shaped recovery. Instead, the recovery would assume a different shape (W-shaped, U-shaped, etc.). This would be slower, involve more long-term damage to both health and economy, and potentially cause problems for some or many consumers, businesses and investments. (See part 14 for more information on the possible "recovery shapes" and their ramifications).

Since this is potentially so important, let's take a look at one of the leading indicators of upcoming deaths: virus infections. Virus infections tend to lead deaths by anywhere from 2 to 8 weeks (depending on how long it takes someone to die and how long it takes their particular location to report the information). These case numbers are not completely reliable due to testing labs' difficulties, in many parts of the country, with getting results back on time. And some states are not reporting all of the positive tests (specifically, the antigen tests). But they can still provide a clue of what might lie ahead with deaths.


How did virus infections look, this week?

Again, we'll ignore the end of the week, since the data is incomplete due to the Christmas holiday. On one hand, infections rose slightly, and this once again set new pandemic highs. On the other hand, the increase was much slower than a couple weeks ago. So this could indicate infections might soon be reaching a top.


At the same time, epidemiologists have repeatedly expressed the fear that many Americans would be likely to ignore health advice and mingle with family and friends outside of their homes during the holidays. And if this happens, we would expect to see another surge.


And sadly, that scenario, of another surge, appears to be playing out. Earlier this week, the U.S. Transportation Security Administration announced that pre-Christmas travel had surpassed 1 million daily passengers for three consecutive days. This was the most travel that's happened during the pandemic. And it broke the previous record set over Thanksgiving. These actions were in direct opposition to the guidance issued by the Centers for Disease Control and health officials who had all discouraged holiday travel.


World round up: crisis intensifies in South Korea, Belgium and the United Kingdom.

How did other countries do this week? As we discussed in part six, South Korea uses an aggressive mixture of the Three T's of epidemic control (testing, tracing and treatment). And through most of the epidemic, it has been one of the world leaders in both minimizing deaths (one of the lowest per million) and also minimizing economic damage (their economy is now mostly open and growth is projected to barely shrink this year, while in comparison, the U.S. still has significant closures and is projected to take a -5.9% hit to GDP). This week, South Korea looked like this:


Unfortunately, this was the second bad week in a row for South Korea. Not only have they accelerated into a third death wave, but they have now exceeded the peak of their first wave.


On Saturday, South Korea's prime minister said:

"The country is at a crossroads of the third wave. ... how we stop the spread hinges on how we spend this year-end and New Year period."

Previously, the government had closed night entertainment venues, including nightclubs and karaoke bars, as well as banned on-site dining after 9 PM. With the latest bad results, they’re now considering shutting down 1.2 million stores and allowing only essential workers into offices.


How is Sweden doing? We used to look at Sweden’s stats in depth every week, because it was following an unorthodox lockdown-lite strategy. And the hope was that it might prove itself as a successful alternate model for other countries to follow. But after a recent surge of infections, hospitalizations and deaths, they’re reversing course and their strategy is becoming much more similar to others. And so far, lockdown-lite has resulted in worse economic damage and a stratospheric death toll (versus the top countries). So we are now switching to a one-month schedule (and we will look at their stats in detail in two weeks).


Meanwhile, the other nations in Europe have been hit by a brutal second wave of deaths. Initially, the continent was bruised badly by the first wave, but used aggressive lockdowns to drive infections and deaths to extremely low levels. So then, countries loosened travel restrictions and reopened schools (despite warnings from many health experts). And, as colder weather hit, the death toll has skyrocketed. So authorities were forced to enact a variety of new lockdowns (which we've described in detail in previous weeks). So how are things going? First, let’s look at Spain. The country is a popular travel destination and was one of the first to get hit by the second wave. And, in the last two months, they've been battling an increasingly bad situation. But in the last month, they finally peaked and deaths mercifully dropped off a little bit. This gave hope that they might finally be getting control of things and turning the corner. How did they do this week?




This week brought more progress and they continued their streak. Let’s hope this continues. How did some of their neighbors in Europe do? Let’s look at the U.K., France, the Netherlands and Belgium. Just a few weeks ago, all of them appeared to be turning the corner simultaneously. But more recently, they’re news has been looking more mixed. What happened this week?



France did the best and had a slight drop. Of this entire group, they’re the only ones that appear to be still turning the corner.


The Netherlands was essentially flat, and higher than their peak a couple weeks ago. So they look like they could be on the verge of losing control again.


On the other hand, both Belgium and the United Kingdom have recently lost control. Deaths accelerated in both countries. And as we discussed last week, the U.K. is fighting a new, mutated strain of the virus which appears to be much more contagious. This makes tackling the crisis in the country even more challenging than before.


State Roundup: "We are running out of options. If people don't stay home for Christmas it will break our hospital"

For the last several months, we've watched individual U.S. states to get insights on what might happen next at the national level. And here's what we saw:


  • 1. Second Wave: After the Memorial Day weekend (in May), we saw the second wave of infections (and eventually deaths) start in the Sunbelt and then spread to the Midwest and Northeast. And the people getting infected were significantly younger than those afflicted by the first wave (many of whom were going to parties and bars). In response, many states put in place virus control measures, including reinstatements of key portions of lockdowns and rules mandating the wearing of masks (in more than 50% of states). And the Sunbelt states made huge progress and fought the wave back down.

  • 2. Third Wave: Then after the Labor Day weekend (in September) the U.S. also reopened schools and cooler weather began in the north. Almost immediately, a third wave began. While this started in just the Midwest and Northeast, it then spread across every major area of the country. And while earlier waves hit mostly urban areas, this new wave was led by rural places Also, since the wave is spreading much wider spread than before, there are now chronic shortages of 29 of the 40 most crucial drugs needed to treat Covid-19 as well as crucially needed medical personnel in many areas.


What happened this week?


Unfortunately, both Covid-19 hospitalizations and ICU usage continued to rise. Once again, the country shattered previous records. And both are now almost double the worst numbers of previous peaks.




As a result, many already overstressed hospital systems were forced to take on even more of a burden. And as of Friday, the Department of Health and Human Services reported that one in five U.S. hospitals were reporting a critical staffing shortage.


Unsurprisingly, statistics showed that non-metro areas were hammered the hardest. More than a dozen small counties, including Burke (North Carolina) and Hale (Texas) reported at least 90% of their ICU beds filled by Covid-19.


Meanwhile, despite the vaccine rollout, many healthcare workers are still bearing unsustainable work and emotional loads. Ann-Marie Alameddin, president and chief executive officer of the Arizona Hospital and Healthcare Association, warned:


“We can’t really downplay the emotional strain. I think there’s going to be lasting effects that we’ll be navigating for months and years to come.”

Let’s dive down to the state level to see how things are going. And let’s look at California first.


In previous weeks, California has implemented automatic lockdowns as ICU capacity deteriorated. How does it look this week?



California’s infections and deaths both dropped at the end of the week. But that may not be real and just due to the holidays (and lack of reporting). Either way, hospitalizations still rose. And once again, they increased to set new pandemic highs.


Back in November, Gov. Gavin Newsom warned that hospitals could be filled up by Christmas Eve. And sadly, on December 24, the state reported an average of 0% ICU capacity in hospitals statewide.


This week, California Gov. Gavin Newsom said:


"We are experiencing a modest decline in the rate of the growth. It doesn't necessarily make a trend ... but it's a modest indication of a possible sign of some good news."

On the other hand, Los Angeles mayor Eric Garcetti reminded citizens of how things got to this point and the danger of complacency:


"There's a straight line between the surge happening now and the gatherings that happened at Thanksgiving. If you gather for the holidays, our hospitals will be overrun."

Patrick McMillan, a physician in Fresno County, agreed, saying:


"If people don't stay home for Christmas this year, we're going to see something that's, it's hard for me to even imagine. I think it will break the health care system if people don't stay home."

Meanwhile, how’s North Carolina looking?




Infections and deaths rose in North Carolina, and then dropped at the end of the week. But the latter could just be due to lack of Christmas reporting so it’s hard to read anything more into it at this early point. And unfortunately, hospitalizations soared and hit a new pandemic high.


How did Tennessee do?





Like the other states, Tennessee saw apparent drops near the end of the week in infections and deaths. But this could be just due to the holidays. Ignoring the end of the week (for lack of reporting), both sets of numbers grew this week.


Hospitalizations also were higher at the end of the week than the beginning.

As a result, Tennessee now has the unwelcome title of the worst state in the U.S. at controlling the virus (highest infections per capita).


And this week, Tennessee Health Commissioner Lisa Piercey said that the healthcare worker shortage has gotten so dire that they would have to relax some of the usual safety precautions. Workers testing positive for infection will now be allowed to continue working in long-term care facilities. The risk with this change is that the patients in these facilities are elderly and most at risk of dying from the disease. But Piercey said the state has no choice:


“I tell you this because we are looking under every rock. We are turning over every stone to help hospitals. We are running out of options.”

Piercey also warned that:


"If we have another surge over Christmas, it will break our hospitals,”

Meanwhile, Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee had previously ignored health advisors and refused to order a statewide mask mandate. But this week, Tennessee First Lady Maria Lee tested positive for the virus (which also caused the governor to go into quarantine as a precaution). And after the press conference by Peircy, some hoped that that Governor Lee might do an about-face. But they were disappointed, as Lee again refused to implement a mandate. Instead, he doubled down on the strategy of relying on personal responsibility and local government.


“Many think a statewide mandate would improve mask-wearing, many think it would have the opposite effect. This has been a heavily politicized issue. Please do not get caught up in that and don’t misunderstand my belief in local government on this issue. Masks work and I want every Tennessean to wear one.”

He did, however, announce an executive order to limit indoor gatherings to 10 people. And he asked people to volunteer to keep all their gatherings to just those in their household.

Medical workers and advocates were less than impressed.


Dr. Aaron Milstone, a critical care pulmonologist treating COVID-19 patients said:


Gov. Lee, we still need you to do your partTennessee needs a statewide mask mandate, and other interventions, to get COVID under control so that Tennesseans can safely stay at work, provide for their families, and keep their kids in school — and most importantly, to save lives.”

The Tennessee Medical Association, a nonprofit advocacy group for state physicians, agreed, saying:


“We believe all Tennessee counties should be under mask requirement orders at this time. We plead with all Tennesseans to stay safe, stay apart, wear masks, and stay home to protect their families and friends from this deadly virus.”

Georgia’s bellwether economic recovery: revisited next week


(Note: Georgia’s economy is now being reviewed only once a month, as described below. Normally, that week would be this week. But due to the holidays causing reporting issues with some of the data, we’ll wait until next week to cover Georgia in more detail).


One of the most important questions for investments (as well as for the health of the country) is "what will the shape and speed of the recovery be?" If it's V-shaped and quick, then many investments will be just fine. On the other hand, if it's one of the other shapes (U-shaped, swoosh, etc.), then some or many investments could run into problems. (See part 14 for more information on the possible "recovery shapes" and their ramifications).


To monitor the evolving situation, we've been watching Georgia very closely. It was one of the first states to reopen. So we expected this to make it a useful early indicator of what could be in store for some other parts of the nation.


Back on April 24, Georgia Governor Brian Kemp reopened nail salons, hairdressers, bowling alleys and gyms (as long as they followed state protocols). Then, three days later, restaurants and theaters were also allowed to reopen. So they've effectively been open for about 6 months.


How are they doing? Since there's no official government or state data on this, we've previously looked at Placer.ai. This is a service which tracks mobile phone usage to different types of businesses to measure foot traffic. And we've watched them week by week across all of Georgia's four primary Covid-19 sensitive industries: restaurants, retail, fitness, and hotels.


How’s that gone over the last six or seven months? We've seen different sectors moving back and forth during that time, as well as different individual businesses in those sectors. But overwhelmingly, results have ranged from disappointing to dismal. And while there have been occasional spurts of improvement to celebrate, these have almost always been quickly followed by disappointing backtracking.


So at this point, the Georgia experiment has failed to achieve its goal of a V-shaped recovery. This is why I’ve called a halt to the weekly monitoring of the state and will only be checking in monthly. We will look again in one more week.


Unemployment: "The beatings will continue until morale improves"


Unemployment has historically been one of the most reliable indicators of when the U.S. has entered a recession and when its left one. So that's why we examine it very closely, every week. And unfortunately, over the last 29 weeks, the economy has been hammered week after week by massive levels of new unemployment. This week was no different, with 830,000 people newly unemployed. This was barely improved from last week (885,000):


Unfortunately, at eight months into the pandemic, we’re still getting weekly job losses that are more than three times the pre-pandemic level. Back in June, virtually no one expected the continuing damage to last this long.


Meanwhile, as we've talked about every week for the last several months: "continuing claims" are also a useful statistic to look at within this report. Jobless claims only tell us who lost jobs over the last week, but continuing claims removes the ones who have been rehired. On the other hand, this statistic isn't perfect, because people who stay unemployed for a large number of weeks lose state benefits and fall off of the statistic.


However, these people then show up in the Pandemic Emergency Unemployment Compensation (PEUC) stat. But this number also has the same problem (people lose this benefit after 13 weeks of unemployment). And at that point, these people have nowhere else to go and simply fall out of both statistics and “disappear”. This can cause the numbers to give the appearance of improvement, while the underlying situation is not actually improving. Also, as we talked about in early December, the U.S. Government Accountability Office (a non-partisan government watchdog) found that statistical issues are causing both under- and over-counting of the PEUC stats. So they should not be viewed as individual people. Still, virtually all economists agree that over time, many of the inaccuracies tend to even out and the trend is still useful to look at.

So how did continuing claims look this week? This week, continuing claims also declined by 170,000 to 5.34 million.


Diane Swonk, chief economist at Grant Thornton in Chicago, said:


“We are losing momentum at a critical time. Consumer spending is pulling back or slowing down at a time when we should be ramping up, and that’s because of the surge in Covid cases.”

Later, a separate report was released by the Commerce Department on consumer spending. This type of spending drives the vast majority of the U.S. economy, so it's closely watched. And unfortunately, it showed a 0.4% drop last month.


This was the first decline since April. Personal income also decreased by 1.1% which reflected the wind-down of several pandemic aid programs (see “Financial Cliff” in the next section).


Financial cliff: Another near-death experience for stimulus but the bill is now law.

As we've discussed over the last several months, there's a huge, but invisible problem with the economy, that's largely unrecognized by the general public. But an overwhelming consensus of economists, analysts (across the political spectrum) and policymakers at the highest levels (including the Federal Reserve) all agree that it's essential we find a solution to it. And if we don't, millions of Americans and businesses are destined to fall over a financial cliff with devastating long-term consequences. If this happens, then we may suffer a debilitating double dip recession (the dreaded "w-shaped recovery"). And investors in many alternative investment asset classes (including certain real estate sectors) could be caught up in a world of hurt.

This financial cliff is caused by several things:


  • 1. Impending collapse of crucial safety nets: On December 26, 10-12 million people who lost jobs due the crisis are scheduled to lose critical benefits they're currently depending on. These were provided by two government programs created by the stimulus package passed by the government earlier in the year. The first is the Pandemic Emergency Unemployment Compensation (PEUC), which gives workers, who've been unemployed so long that they've exhausted state unemployment benefits, an additional 13-week lifeline. The second is the Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (PUA) for workers in the gig economy who are otherwise unable to get the same benefits that traditional workers receive when they lose their jobs. If they don't get any additional help, the damage to the economy will be severe, immediate and potentially long-lasting.

  • 2. Foreclosure and rental eviction tsunami: in January 2021, moratoriums on evictions and foreclosures are scheduled to expire. If this happens, then a tidal wave of 8 million delinquent homeowners are set to be foreclosed on and lose their homes (dwarfing the worst of the Great Recession). And 12 million more delinquent renters (owing an average of $5850 in back rent and utilities and $7.2 billion in total by the end of the year) will be evicted, as well. If the tsunami is allowed to occur, then it will have a devastating effect on real estate and the wider economy.

  • 3. Student loan resumption: The CARES Act suspended payments and interest on $1.7 trillion in student debt during the pandemic. And the Federal Reserve estimated this saved borrowers from paying about $7 billion a month. But on January 1st, this protection is scheduled to be lifted and payment will become due. If this is allowed to occur, it has the potential to exacerbate the other two issues.

All of these things could be solved if Congress and the President could agree to pass a new stimulus law. However, over the last several months, efforts to do that have been stymied by enough twists and turns to write a novel. Here’s the very quick summary:


1. One political party (which we’ll call the "large stimulus party") controls the House of Representatives and passed a $3.5 trillion stimulus bill in May. They later downsized it and passed a $2.2 trillion bill in October. In early December they dropped further and agreed to a $908 trillion baseline compromise plan created by a group of senators in both parties.


2. The other party (which we'll call the "small stimulus party") controls the Senate. Its leadership proposed a $1 billion plan, but could not get enough support from its own members to pass a bill. This was downsized to $500 million, but had insufficient internal consensus to pass a bill. Then in December, some small stimulus party senators contributed to the bi-partisan compromise plan for $908 trillion dollars. And last week the small stimulus party put their backing behind the bill.


3. The White House has held a variety of positions, from less than $1 billion to higher than $2.2 trillion. After the election it temporarily withdrew from negotiations but more recently returned.


4. The President-elect is from the large stimulus party and is scheduled to be sworn in on January 20. He expressed his support for the compromise plan as a “down payment” for further action later.


5. Control of the Senate will be determined by two January 5th Senate seat runoffs in Georgia. If the small stimulus party wins at least one seat, then nothing will change and they will retain control. On the other hand, if the large stimulus party wins both seats, then additional stimulus is expected to be a slam-dunk. Currently, analysts believe the most likely scenario is that seats will be split between the two parties which would result in no change in the lack of new stimulus. However, this is unpredictable and we'll continue to monitor it.


So what happened this week? Early in the week, stimulus seemed to be in the bag. After months of white knuckled negotiation, both sides had finally agreed on significant compromises and a package both could live with. And amazingly, a bill passed both the House and Senate and was sent to the President to sign. Most assumed the signing would be a nonevent, since the president's own personal representative (Treasury Secretary Stephen Mnuchin), as one of the main parties at the negotiating table, helped shape the agreement. Sec. Mnuchin seemed to support that assumption, telling the press on Monday:


"This is a very, very fast way of getting money into the economy. Let me emphasize: People are going to see this money at the beginning of next week.'

However, on Tuesday night, the president posted a bombshell four-minute video. And in it, he declared the bill was a "disgrace" and demanded significant changes, including $2000 direct payment checks to individuals. However, as discussed earlier, this concept (the $2000 checks) is a nonstarter with the vast majority of the President's own political party. And that's the reason the large stimulus party had dropped it from their previous bills. So after the President posted his video, the entire process was thrown into doubt and there was no longer a clear path forward.

Then on Wednesday, the large stimulus party (which controls the House) attempted to amend the bill by including the $2000 direct payment demanded by the White House. This was promptly blocked by the small stimulus party from going to the floor.


After the defeat, the large stimulus leader in the House called on the President to break the logjam with his political party. She also said:


“On Monday, I will bring the House back to session where we will hold a recorded vote on our standalone bill to increase economic impact payments to $2,000. To vote against this bill is to deny the financial hardship that families face and to deny them the relief they need.”

Many analysts noted that putting congresspeople on record as opposing the change would put many of them in a difficult political position with many of their constituents. And this might cause some to flip their vote in favor of it. But most analysts felt the odds of this happening in large enough numbers to bridge the gap are probably very low.

UPDATE: But on Sunday night, the president surprised everyone and signed the bill, making it law. Next week we will go into detail on what it entails, including some of the criticisms and potential economic consequences.

CBRE report predicts commercial real estate’s pandemic pain is only just beginning

As we discussed a few weeks ago, the Federal Reserve singled out commercial real estate (CRE) as a potential point of concern in its Financial Stability Report. The reason is that problems in CRE can easily ripple out way beyond just investors and their tenants. Most cities depend on commercial properties to support their tax bases. And so, a downturn in CRE could pummel their budgets. And this, along with loan losses, could put considerable stress on the entire banking system.


So far though, this is just a concern rather than a prediction. Still, many are watching CRE very closely. And this week, several companies put out eagerly anticipated reports.

Early in the week, Trepp, a real estate analytics company, released the latest statistics on how the largest commercial real estate loans are doing. These are called commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS), and in the past, these kinds of loans have been considered some of the safest. But over the last several months, some have taken staggering losses. Retail delinquencies are currently at a very painful 14%. And hotels are even worse of a bloodbath at 20%.


And, many analysts have pointed out that these numbers may significantly understate the underlying problems. That’s because many tenants have been able to use forbearance and other means to avoid defaulting. But, these techniques can only last so long. And so some are worried that we may be on the cusp of a wave of problematic loans. Wendy Silverstein, a former executive with Vornado Realty Trust and WeWork, says:


“That period of ‘let’s just put a Band-Aid on it’ is more or less coming to a conclusion. There’s a lot of collateral damage that’s going to be hanging around for a while.”

What effect will this have on commercial real estate prices? CBRE (a real estate analytics firm) posted their projections this week. Ominously, they believe that commercial real estate’s pain has really only begun:


For example, they expect apartments, offices and retail to decline further than they are today into the middle of next year (2021). Apartments and offices are expected to rebound first and recover to pre-pandemic levels in 2022. On the other hand, retail is expected to take a painfully long time to regain its footing and will probably not fully recover until 2024.

On the other hand, industrial real estate (which underpins the growing "delivery economy") is projected to continue to outperform. Dave Bragg, a managing director at real estate research firm Green Street, essentially concurred, saying:

Retail will remain just a mess, hospitality will have a very challenging year, and, in more isolated instances, office will be problematic."

Experts suspect new highly contagious UK variant mutation may already be in the U.S.


As we discussed last week, British authorities have detected a new mutation of the SARS-CoV-2 virus that could have significant health and economic repercussions, not just for the U.K., but the entire world.

The new strain is called B.1.1.7 and it was caused by several mutations to the virus's spike protein. And since that spike is how the virus invades the body, the changes appear to have made the virus much more contagious than the original. Initially, it was thought that it would be as much as 70% more contagious. This week, scientists walked that back to about 50%. But still, even that number would be large enough to cause significant problems.

Experts warned that B.1.1.7 has rapidly become the dominant strain in the U.K., in an astonishingly small amount of time. From a single known case a couple months ago, the mutation jumped to 28% of all infections in November and 62% the week ending December 9. And as a result, the U.K. (which had hoped to loosen lockdowns) is now being forced to return to the strictest stages from the early pandemic. And this time, officials say the restrictions may not be lifted for months (until a vaccine is widely available). The U.K. economy was already staggering from previous lockdowns. So many fear that this mutation may end up exacerbating the considerable pain from an already weak economy.

But, health experts are concerned for more than just the U.K. In this interconnected world, the mutated virus is likely to spread across countries and continents quickly. And if it does, then the entire world might experience the same fate. So several countries prohibited all travel to the U.K. over the last week (although currently not the U.S.). And scientists have been scrambling to learn as much as possible about the new variant.

This week, scientists in the U.K. announced that those infected by the new mutation appear to carry a higher viral load than those hit by the original virus. And a recent study of 30,000 infected people and their close contacts shows that the higher the load, the higher the chance of infecting others. So, many thought this probably explained why the mutation is spreading so quickly.

Meanwhile, researchers at the London School of Hygiene and Topical Medicine noticed something peculiar with the mutation data. For some reason, children are now being infected at a much higher rate than when only the original was around:

This isn’t proof positive that the virus affects children more (since perhaps something else is causing the increase). But more and more scientists are beginning to believe that this is a possibility. Neil Ferguson, a professor and an infectious disease epidemiologist at Imperial College of London said:

“There is a hint that it has a higher propensity to infect children. We haven’t established any sort of causality on that, but we can see it in the data. We will need to gather more data to see how it behaves going forward.”

If this ends up being accurate, then the U.K. may be forced to shut down schools to get control. And since school closures would cause some adults to have to stop working (to take care of the children) this could have significant negative effects on the economy.

Meanwhile, South African scientists announced that their country has their own fast spreading mutation making the rounds. Interestingly, geneticists believe it occurred completely independently of the U.K. variant, but it happens to share one of the key mutations found on B.1.1.7’s spike protein. And this change has also been linked to higher viral load and contagiousness. So, many scientists are now coming to believe that this new strain is why the epidemic has unexpectedly accelerated in South Africa.

At this point, B.1.1.7 has officially been spotted only in Britain, Australia, Denmark, Iceland and the Netherlands. But unfortunately, most health experts believe that it’s actually much more widely circulated than we can see.

Britain happens to have one of the best systems in the world for sequencing the genes of viral samples taken from Covid-19 patients. About 10% of their samples are sequenced, versus only about 1% in other European countries. And Europe itself is doing much better at sequencing than many other countries. For example, since the beginning of December, the United States has sampled only a measly 40 people. In comparison, Britain has sampled 3700 patients in the last week alone. With so little testing outside of Britain, the odds of the many other countries detecting the variant is extremely small.

And this has caused some health analysts to theorize that this new variant may be driving some of the surprising increases that we've seen in countries around the world recently.

On Wednesday, Dr. Anthony Fauci, the top infectious disease expert in the U.S. government was asked if the virus might already be in the U.S. He said:

“When you have this amount of spread within a place like the U.K., you really need to assume that it’s here already … it certainly is not the dominant strain, but I would certainly not be surprised at all if it is already here.”


Update on My Investment Strategy

Every week, I take a look at the latest developments and data and reevaluate my personal outlook on the possible economic scenarios and my personal investment strategy. This week, I have made no changes and my strategy is essentially the same as last week.

  • Treatment: Back in May many health experts said we wouldn't get a vaccine for at least two years. But, after I saw unprecedented amounts of resources being thrown against the virus week after week (and their successes), I felt this was overly pessimistic. And on May 21st, I said I thought the chances were good that we would have one vaccine by winter (and with luck we might get two). It turns out the world has been very lucky and we will end up with two right before the end of the year. Unfortunately, as I also predicted in late May: these can't be manufactured and distributed in large enough quantities to immediately treat everyone. Most in the U.S. will have to wait well into 2021). So this will not be enough to super-charge the economy right away. And, there may potentially be a huge quality-of-life difference between the treatment-haves and treatment have-nots. This will be divisive and will exacerbate existing tensions and conflicts between rich and poor countries. And it's likely to cause considerable instability in "have-not" countries that could easily cause unexpected global consequences, not just for themselves but also for the U.S. and the world.

  • Recession: When the U.S. was first hit by the virus, many pundits claimed the U.S. economy was so strong, it would have little to no effect (or if it did, then it would rebound quickly and things would be back to normal in a jiffy). But, after looking at all of the micro data week after week, I said I couldn't see any way the country could avoid plunging into a technical recession (two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth). Ultimately that happened (-5% in Q1 and -32.9% in Q2). Then as the Q3 data unfolded week after week I predicted we would see strong double-digit growth but also disappointingly short of the amount needed to break even to where things were before the pandemic. Ultimately both happened: 33.1% increase from rock-bottom but still -3.5% year to date (similar to the worst of the Great Recession at -4%) Going forward I unfortunately believe that all of the easy gains are gone and the rest will be a long, tough slog. Q4 will bring us up modestly but it will still come up short of the amount needed to "break even" to where we would have been in Q4 without the pandemic (and thus well short of a true V-shaped recovery). And then unless we get more stimulus or extension on eviction/foreclosure moratoriums, Q1 of 2021 will be brutal and might even be bad enough to cause a double dip recession.

  • Shape of the recovery: In part 14, we talked about how the shape of the recovery (V-shaped, U-shaped, swoosh-shaped, W-shaped, L-shaped, combo-shaped etc.) will have a huge effect on the ultimate outcome of many different investments. So far, pretty much everything that's happened has been much worse than the consensus expected. Pretty much no one saw the virus spreading in the U.S. in any meaningful way. Virtually no one came close to imagining that lock-downs would occur in May. Hundreds of thousands more people have been killed than originally projected. And now, even the later May projections, which maxed out at 200,000 dead, have proven to be too optimistic. Tens of millions more people than expected have lost jobs. The stimulus and unemployment aid was enormous, but had too many unexpected holes and didn't get into the hands of millions who needed it the most. States reopened, but were forced to backtrack. Many businesses have reopened, but customers are staying away. So unfortunately, I don't think a quick, V-shaped recovery is going to happen. I would love to be wrong. I'm getting more and more concerned about a very damaging "W", which could come from the second and/or third waves of the virus. Unfortunately, this is looking more and more likely. My slim hope is that the 3rd wave can be controlled and kept small. If this happens... and if the US government also passes a generous stimulus law... then the worst effects of the additional waves could be mitigated. That's a lot of "if's"... so we'll see. And I'll continue to monitor the data very closely. Currently, I still believe we will have a three-stage combo-shaped recovery that starts off (1) quickly as the first "easy" industries and companies come back online (i.e. v-shaped). But (2) this will peter out as the more difficult ones are unable to return, and a slow swoosh will become apparent. If we get a second (or third) lockdown, then this step (2) will become W-shaped and more painful. Then in winter, (3) I believe we will probably see a treatment and/or vaccine. And if we do, then that would be the trigger for the third stage and an accelerated recovery. But this most likely won't be a straight-V recovery, because it will most likely take time to ramp up production and delivery to enough Americans to push towards herd immunity (not until well into 2021). So the boost will be slower and smaller at first. Also, if the first generation medicines don't stop the spread to others (don't have sterilizing immunity) the boost will be even smaller. But, we also could get a little lucky (for example, if we get a successful vaccine treatment that is a newer type that can be scaled up more quickly or is more effective). If so, then the third-stage boost would be faster. If I'm wrong, and we don't get a treatment or vaccine this year, then the economic damage caused by long-term job loss and wage cuts will most likely be very severe, and will further exacerbate (and slow down) whatever type of recovery we do get. That would probably be ugly for the majority of all investments. So let's hope we don't have to find out how that scenario would play out.

  • Investments: If the above is roughly correct, then it will unfortunately be painful for many individuals and some investors. And some sub-sectors of alternative investing (like certain real estate classes) will come under heavy stress. Many may fold in the coming months. At the same time, I think there will also be an opportunity to purchase dislocated and distressed assets at very favorable pricing and significant discounts. And I believe that patient, discerning investors may be able to take advantage of once-in-a-decade or once-in-a-generation opportunities.

  • Strategy:

  1. No new investments in real estate or any asset classes that are correlated with the unemployment or the business cycle until there is more clarity about the unknowns concerning the virus and the upcoming financial cliff.

  2. Invest in assets that are coronavirus resistant (and uncorrelated with the business cycle). That includes:

  3. Music royalties (which can actually do better in lockdowns due to increased streaming).

  4. Life settlements (which actually perform better when people are dying faster and in any event aren't directly tied to the business cycle).

  5. Litigation finance (which performs based on winning or losing cases, and also isn't directly tied to the business cycle).

  6. Invest in coronavirus "portfolio insurance" (i.e. an investment that would be expected to do better the longer coronavirus continues or if it gets worse).

  7. N95 Mask Manufacturing Company. If the pandemic should disappear tomorrow (which I personally am not counting on), I would be happy to take a small loss here given that the rest of my portfolio would be doing extremely well. On other hand, if Covid-19 doesn't disappear and things go as I expect (or worse), then this investment could provide a welcome profit boost and improve my diversification.

  8. Continue to hold cash and be patient for dislocated and distressed opportunities. The worse the economic damage, the more chance there will be for those once-in-a-generation or once-in-a-lifetime opportunities.


My opinions and strategy will change if we get some better or worse news on the science side or in some of the other X factors. For example, a new stimulus law could shift things in a more positive direction. And, as I mentioned above, the virus getting out of control again in large areas and forcing large lock-downs a second or third time, could easily make things worse.

Next Article


How will Covid-19/Coronavirus Affect my Alternative Investment Portfolio? Part 45: January 9th


Progress against third U.S. death wave appears a temporary blip, as new fatalities climb relentlessly and shatter records; Crystal ball: After brief reprieve, third infection wave accelerates again; World round up: multiple countries losing war to virus as Sweden prepares hard lock-down, U.K. hospitals become "a war zone" and quicker-spreading mutation gains stronger foothold; State Roundup: More hospitals “stretched to the absolute limits” as a record 16 states simultaneously set Covid-19 hospitalization highs; Georgia’s bellwether economic recovery: revisited in three weeks; Unemployment: Strong headwinds to recovery continue; Dual monthly unemployment reports show economic recovery dangerously stalling; Financial cliff (part 1): Covid-19 relief law passed at last; Financial cliff (part 2): Losers of the new pandemic aid law; “Large stimulus” party flips two key seats to control Congress as President-elect demands more pandemic-relief; New faster-spreading mutation found across multiple states as scientists criticize anemic U.S. response as “a scandal”; U.S. vaccination effort comes under intense criticism after falling well short of goals; Update on my portfolio strategy.


View next article



526 views2 comments
About Ian Ippolito
image1 - headshot.jpg

Ian Ippolito is an investor and serial entrepreneur. He has been interviewed by the Wall Street Journal, Business Week, Forbes, TIME, Fast Company, TechCrunch, CBS News, FOX News, USA Today, Bloomberg News, Realtor.com, CoStar News, Curbed and more.

 

Ian was impressed by the potential of real estate crowdfunding, but frustrated by the lack of quality site reviews and investment analysis. He created The Real Estate Crowdfunding Review to fill that gap.

More information
Subscribe
join our mailing list
Tweets
  • White Facebook Icon
  • White Twitter Icon
  • White Google+ Icon

© 2015-2021 By Exhedra Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes your acceptance of it's terms and conditions.
 

Code of Ethics: To remove conflicts of interest that are rife on other sites, I / we do not accept any money from any sponsors or platforms for publicity nor for the referral of any investors. This includes but is not limited to: no money for postings, nor reviews, nor tutorials, nor guides, nor advertising, nor affiliate leads etc. Nor do I negotiate special terms for myself above what I negotiate for the benefit of members. For clarity: I do receive monetary compensation in 2 ways. Site members can send donations (and a $200 donation entitles them to access my personal low-level due diligence notes on investments I've put money into). And if the club chooses to create a feeder, I take a fee as manager (and keep the excess beyond expenses). Additionally I receive the same non-monetary compensation all club members do: access to otherwise inaccessible sponsors, millions of dollars of special deals and discounts, the satisfaction of giving back and helping others, and more.

I/we are just investors expressing our opinion, and are not an attorney, nor an accountant, nor your financial advisor. Always consult with your own licensed professional before making any investment decision. All information provided is personal opinion only, and does not constitute professional, financial, tax, legal or other advice. It may contains errors so use at your own risk.